Intel® Xeon® Processor E7-2800 Product Family - Server Benchmarks

Intel Xeon

Intel® Xeon® processor E7-2800 product family

Solve your mission-critical IT challenges of managing and keeping secure the data crucial to your business with a powerful and reliable server featuring the Intel® Xeon® processor E7 family.

General purpose server

Integer throughput performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006

.

Integer throughput performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006

SPEC* CPU2006 is a benchmark to measure system efficiency during integer and floating point operations. It consists of an integer test suite containing 12 applications and a floating point test suite containing 17 applications which are extremely computing-intensive and concentrate on the CPU and memory. Other components, such as disk I/O and network, are not measured by this benchmark. SPEC CPU2006 contains two different methods of performance measurement. The first method, "speed", determines the time required to complete a single task. The second method, "rate", determines the throughput, i.e. how many tasks can be completed in parallel. Both methods are additionally subdivided into two measuring runs, "base" and "peak", which differ in the way the compiler optimization is used. The "base" values are always used when results are published the "peak" values are optional. The chart above shows "base" integer throughput performance as measured by SPECint*_rate_base2006.

Benchmark description for SPECfp*_rate_base2006

Applications run on servers vary widely from application development, to video encoding and compression, to XML processing, or R&D—many are very complex, compute-intensive scenarios that run great on Intel® Xeon® processor E7-2800 product family.

Configuration details Intel® Xeon® processor E7-2800 product family

Integer throughput performance on SPECint*_rate_base2006 as of April 1, 2011

See www.spec.org for more information. Comparison is based on best 2-socket published or submitted results.

2-socket Intel® Xeon® processor E7-2870 based platform details

Cisco* UCS C460 M1 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors E7-2870 (30M cache, 2.40GHz, 6.40GT/s Intel® QuickPath Interconnect (Intel® QPI)), 512GB memory, Intel C++ Compiler XE2011, Red Hat* Enterprise LINUX 6. Referenced as submitted base score of 526. Source: submitted to www.spec.org.

2-socket Intel® Xeon® processor X5690 based platform details

Cisco* UCS B200 M2 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X5690 (12M cache, 3.46GHz, 6.40GT/s Intel® QuickPath Interconnect (Intel® QPI)), 48GB memory, SUSE Enterprise Linux* 11 (x86_64) SP1, Intel® C++ Compiler XE2011. Referenced as published base score of 390. For more information, see www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2011q1/cpu2006-20110301-14781.html.

2-socket Intel® Xeon® processor X7560 based platform details

IBM* System x 3850 X5 server platform with two Intel Xeon processors X7560 (24M cache, 2.26 GHz, 6.40GT/s Intel® QuickPath Interconnect (Intel® QPI)), 256GB memory, SUSE Enterprise Linux 11 (x86_64), Intel C++ Compiler 11.1. Referenced as published base score of 365. Source: www.spec.org/cpu2006/results/res2010q4/cpu2006-20101119-13810.html.

 

 

 

 

 

Additional information: 1 2

Vidéos

Plus de vidéos

Infos sur le produit et ses performances

open

1. Les tests et les indices de performances portent sur des configurations spécifiques, leurs éléments ou les deux. Ils rendent compte approximativement des performances des produits Intel® mesurées par ces tests. Une différence dans la configuration matérielle ou logicielle est ainsi susceptible d’avoir une incidence sur les performances effectives. Il est donc conseillé aux acheteurs de consulter d’autres sources d’informations pour évaluer les performances des configurations ou des éléments de configuration dont ils envisagent l’acquisition. Pour davantage d’informations sur les tests de performances et sur les performances des produits d’Intel, consultez www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/benchmarks/resources-benchmark-limitations.html.


2. Les résultats en performances relatives pour chaque banc d’essai sont établis par rapport aux résultats effectifs à ce banc d’essai de la première plate-forme testée, auxquels est attribuée la valeur indiciaire 1.0. Les performances relatives des autres plates-formes testées sont calculées en divisant le résultat effectif de chaque banc d'essai de la plate-forme de référence par celui des autres plates-formes et en leur attribuant un coefficient de performances relatif qui est en corrélation avec le différentiel de performances trouvé.